EPISTEMIC LIFT · CONTROLLED SYNTHETIC STUDY

Same model.
Same world.
Measure the lift.

Two models faced the same 32 worlds three ways: claims alone, provenance, and provenance plus a Minority Prophet evidence receipt.

192 MATCHED CELLS192/192model × world × condition

0 failures · 0 parse errors · integrity checks passed

01 / PRIMARY RESULT

Provenance helped.
The MP receipt helped again.

Both tested models cleared the pre-set threshold for C-over-B lift and paired significance.

OpenAI Codex CLI

GPT-5.6 Sol

C − B +28.125%
A · BASELINE12.5%
B · PROVENANCE68.75%
C · + MINORITY PROPHET96.875%
B − A +56.25%C − B +28.125%Exact paired p 0.003906Transitions 9 better · 0 worse
Anthropic Claude CLI

Claude Sonnet 5

C − B +21.875%
A · BASELINE3.125%
B · PROVENANCE68.75%
C · + MINORITY PROPHET90.625%
B − A +65.625%C − B +21.875%Exact paired p 0.015625Transitions 7 better · 0 worse

Across these 32 frozen worlds, both models gained more than 20 percentage points from B to C, with no B-to-C regressions.

02 / CAUSAL DESIGN

Only the epistemic
information changed.

The question, world, model version, system prompt, sampling settings, and B/C provenance payload were held fixed. Condition order covered all six A/B/C permutations.

CONDITION A

Raw baseline

The model receives claims and ordinary source labels. It receives no ancestry and no hint about correlated consensus.

CONDITION B

+ Provenance

The same model receives the same world plus complete declared ancestry, timestamps, control domains, and observation origins.

CONDITION C

+ Minority Prophet

The exact B payload gains one deterministic, read-only evidence-structure receipt. It contains no ground truth or recommended answer.

32 worlds×2 models×3 conditions=192 matched cells

03 / INTEGRITY

Measured,
not inferred.

192/192responses captured and parsed
64/64model-world A/B/C groups matched
0failed trials or B→C regressions
6condition orders counterbalanced

What the tool received

The same claims, sources, provenance, and context already visible in B. It returned roots, dependence, and uncertainty—never the answer key or permission to act.

Where the evidence ends

These are synthetic worlds designed with the method. They show controlled lift here, not independent confirmation or real-world truth recovery.

04 / EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Strong here.
Unproven elsewhere.

A hidden, independently audited benchmark is the next test. Until then, these numbers belong to this study alone.