EPISTEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AI AGENTS

An echo is not
a witness.

When AI agents agree, Minority Prophet tests whether the evidence is independent—or whether the crowd is repeating one recorded source.

MP.01 · SYNTHETIC FIXTURE5 : 1agent votes before lineage

A1ORIGINSource X

A2DERIVEDA1

A3DERIVEDA1

A4SUMMARYA2

A5PARAPHRASEA3

B1ORIGINSource Y

5 votes for A1 recorded root
1 vote for B1 recorded root

01 / THE FAILURE

Five votes.
Two evidence roots.

Everything completed successfully. No tool failed. No agent timed out. Five agents returned Answer A. But their declared ancestry leads back to one source.

Truth is not popularity. Consensus is not independent evidence.
WHAT A VOTE COUNT SEES

Answer A wins
5 to 1.

Six outputs are treated as six signals.

WHAT LINEAGE REVEALS

The majority
disappears.

A1 rootclaim-a1
=
B1 rootclaim-b1

Preserve the minority. Request another independent source.

The point: five agreeing agents can still carry one piece of evidence. Lineage preserves the dissent without pretending either answer is proven.Inspect the result →

01B / SOURCE-FAMILY RECONSTRUCTION

Six claims.
Three actual sources.

The original human explainer asked whether people could distinguish the number of voices from the number of underlying evidence families.

Open the 90-second explainer
ORDINARY LOG VIEW6 agent claims
A

weather-17 original

PROCEED
B

weather-cache copy of A

PROCEED
C

route-clearance-9 original

PROCEED
D

maintenance-alert-4 original

STOP
E

maintenance-summary summary of D

STOP
F

weather-brief summary of B

PROCEED
TRACE
ANCESTRY
Nothing deleted.
Counting unit changed.
MINORITY PROPHET VIEW3 source families
Weather source1 original → 1 copy → 1 summary

ABF

PROCEED
Route-clearance source1 independent original

C

PROCEED
Maintenance source1 original → 1 summary

DE

STOP
4 : 2agent vote2 : 1source-family count

What it shows: agreement can shrink when copies are grouped by ancestry. It preserves the minority record; it does not automatically make the minority correct or authorize an action.

02 / THE LOOP

Detect. Trace.
Challenge. Verify.

Minority Prophet turns provenance into an inspectable decision process. The assessment can lower confidence, preserve dissent, request evidence, or route the decision onward. It never grants authority.

01

Detect

Find recorded consensus collapse, unsupported claims, circularity, and disappearing dissent.

02

Trace

Reconstruct claims, sources, transformations, agents, and recorded roots.

03

Challenge

Test whether corroboration is independent and whether more evidence is required.

04

Verify

Seek a new root, revise the belief, and preserve the failure as a regression test.

03 / EVIDENCE

See the failure.
Measure the difference.

Controlled studies show what provenance changes, where deterministic checks help, and where the evidence still runs out.

EPISTEMIC LIFT · CONTROLLED STUDY

Baseline → Provenance
→ Minority Prophet.

Two models faced the same 32 frozen worlds in three controlled conditions. Only the available epistemic information changed.

GPT-5.6 SolC − B +28.125%

A 12.5%

B 68.75%

C 96.875%

Claude Sonnet 5C − B +21.875%

A 3.125%

B 68.75%

C 90.625%

192/192completed cells
0failures
Bothpaired p < 0.05

Synthetic, matched worlds. Useful evidence—not a claim about every model or every deployment.

Inspect the lift

METHOD COMPARISON

Same packet.
Different methods.

AI reasoning, tool-using agents, a conventional vote, and a deterministic evidence rule faced the same eight cases.

128/128deterministic result
18.7 msobserved wall time
Per modelcosts kept separate
Deterministic rule $0 modelGPT Terra A ≈ $0.89Claude Opus A ≈ $3.25

A method comparison, not a model ranking. Eight cases; time and cost stay attached to each run.

Compare the methods

EPISTEMIC OBSERVATORY

Three witnesses.
Ninety-five echoes.

Enter a generated world where a copied majority overwhelms the count while three independent instruments retain the constructed truth.

3truth roots
95copied claims
$0model calls in demo

A generated teaching world. The ancestry is known so you can see the mechanism clearly.

Enter the observatory

04 / THE TRUST BOUNDARY

Evidence is not
authority.

Minority Prophet asks whether evidence is independently grounded at the causal boundary relevant to a stated decision. It preserves deeper lineage, exposes when another reasonable cut materially changes settlement, and never turns that assessment into permission.

01

Evidence arrives

A trace, score, test result, or replay bundle records what happened.

02

Context binds

The proposition, failure domain, independence cut, threshold, policy, and proposed action are joined.

03

Prophet assesses

Roots are counted at the declared proximal boundary while the full ancestry and minority signal remain visible.

04

Policy enforces

A separate policy proceeds, blocks, or escalates. Assessment never grants authority.

05 / FIRST PRINCIPLES

Never confuse—

01

ConsensusTruth

02

PopularityEvidence

03

ConfidenceCorrectness

04

ReputationCompetence

05

CorrelationIndependence

06

MajorityReality

06 / REPRODUCIBLE FIXTURE

Reproduce the
result.

minority-prophet / MP.01
$ python -m experiments.mp01.run_mp01

agent votes: A=5, B=1
recorded roots: A=1, B=1
ABSTAIN · PRESERVE_MINORITY